[Standards] [Educationaltrajectory] Educational Achievement comments and recommendations
alansz at uic.edu
Thu Oct 13 14:49:32 UTC 2016
Quoting Valerie Smothers (vsmothers at jhmi.edu):
>Dear Standards Committee and Educational Trajectory Working Group:
>Section 8.2, Page 23, the Language element, indicates the language of the
>achievement data for a program of study. Would achievement data for a program
>ever be conveyed in more than one language? Are there Canadian schools that
>would have data in both French and English, for example?
I am not from a Canadian school, but that would not surprise me
>Section 8.2, Page 23, Supporting Link, recommend multiple. That would allow for
>links to multiple supporting documents for the curriculum.
>Section 8.3.1, page 29 and section 8.6.1, page 63, Site – recommend adding a
>sentence to provide recommended usage.
>Section 8.3.3, page 36, Date – this is the date of assessment. Recommend adding
>clarification about which date should be used for assessments lasting more than
>one day – the last day or the first?
Agree, and I suggest the last day makes most sense.
>Section 8.3.3, page Observation Duration and observer role – Is it possible to
>have more than one observer? And if there is more than one observer, should
>each observer’s duration of observation and role be captured independently?
I think it is safe to treat more than one observer as more than
one observation, and therefore each would be captured as a separate
observation (of the same event).
>Section 8.3.4, page 39, 44, and 47 – Not Yet assessable - Are there other
>possible reasons for a score to be missing (withheld, restricted, invalidated,
>pending, etc.)? Should those be documented?
The Michael Reese Endowed Professor of Medical Education
Associate Head, UIC Department of Medical Education
Research Professor, UIC Department of Pediatrics
alansz at uic.edu | http://ulan.mede.uic.edu/alansz | PGP: 0x062556CF
More information about the Standards